Over time, various major organized crime groups opposed the establishment of the Era of the use of mental data in conflict resolution and in the administration of the Act.
Given the unprecedented capabilities that are coming with technology, it would seem wise to set up one or more dates for the application of memory extraction procedures, in the case of criminal organizations, so that crimes committed before that date are not retroactively targeted.
This would have the consequence of avoiding any overcrowding of the prison and judicial systems, while allowing a flexible and clearly dated adaptation of the ten-year or even century-old methods of organized crime, while also simplifying the administration of the law and the determination of sentences for personnel whose profession was crime (with customers, suppliers, and dedicated professional resources, operating under contract) for periods beyond forty years of clandestine activity.
If we do not take this road, the structures for maintaining the organizations, some of which have been in place for 30 to 40 years, risk collapsing and we risk witnessing mass arrests, and a form of erosion of the many elements located at the borders of legality, as well as fierce opposition to the implementation of the new paradigms.
A well-understood adaptation would be in order, and in return a real collaboration between the police and organized crime would be desirable.
If there is no area of diminishment and openness that allows for a gradual evolution towards a stable state of law enforcement, while allowing for an adaptation of methods, cases, and modus operandi on both sides of the administration of the Act, the overall system may either fracture in some way or become more in ways that may affect other related environments.
- Why should the administration of substitution drugs (e.g. electromagnetic treatments) be entrusted to Organized Crime?
Organized crime is already in contact with customers, can validate the degree of adherence to the adoption of substitutes, and can contribute to a gradual transition rather than an abrupt interruption that would cause individuals to look for disparate suppliers while encouraging the multiplication of initiatives to maintain conventional supply.
In addition, the products sold could be subject to taxes, monitoring and control allowing the regulation of transactions and uses in order to optimize the benefits for the economy (reduction of overdoses, increased surveillance of organized crime), while providing the State with additional capacity to impose additional constraints on the operations of crime, which would also have the responsibility for its own sustainability to comply with the Government’s imperatives.
This strategy would have the benefit of introducing a form of ‘Trojan Horse’ within the structures of Organized Crime in order to better control the flow of illicit substances, to unify the largest groups by making them responsible for neutralizing or integrating small groups, and to establish an accurate directory of individual members for the purpose of investigation and strict monitoring of activities that may fuel corruption. collusion as well as any attempt to evade the Laws in force.
The recurrent stratagem (Montreal, New York, Cosa Nostra, Marseille) whereby foreign interference makes use of the provision of neuromodulation technology and synthetic telepathy within Organized Crimes Abroad to gain a share of influence and infiltrate the territory thanks to their complicity received in return, would be considerably undermined in the event that Western governments took the initiative to provide the main groups of Organized Crime similar capacity premises (e.g., only one main unit per region).
Leave a comment