Kinsedates·2022

A coordinated effort to install foreign influence over North American institutions is underway. It involves brain-to-brain technology, an important research workforce gap, and a domain where Western structures may be badly outpaced in a field most people don’t know exists.

The Research Gap at the Heart of Brain-to-Brain Defense

The central tension described here is a workforce mismatch — Western governments are operating with a research capacity in brain-to-brain technology that is orders of magnitude smaller than what adversarial states have already deployed, and that legislation and defense strategies haven’t caught up to the reality on the ground.

A comparison of research capacity across three countries presents stark figures:

India : approximately 900,000 scientists, 9,000 brain-to-brain scientists, with a planned attack on North America and Europe since about 1978

Canada : 37 000 federal scientists, an estimate of roughly 370 dedicated researchers, virtually close to 0 as Canada uses the NASA and/or India systems

U.S. : approximately 200 000 Government scientists, and an estimate of 2,000 brain-to-brain scientists for the United States

Even though the collectively accepted narrative is that the technology is theoretical, the Indian side has been staffing it for decades while our side is running on a skeleton crew as we’re hoping the subject stays classified.

This logic has been strategically exploited by our assailants as keeping brain-to-brain capabilities covert and outside legislation allows adversaries to durably install selected individuals in positions of power and proceed to neurally control high-profile individuals in the conversion of the U.S. and Canada as Vassal states.

In this global paradigm, the covertness is the weapon. If it never enters law, it never enters defense budgets. The gap has been widening quietly since the late-70s and will continue to do so if the defense research in this domain doesn’t match the active threat of India, France and Italy.

There are three main obstacles to future legislation: 

1. the obsolete idea that neural surveillance shouldn’t affect private life,

2. vulnerability to demographic workforce ratios, 

3. the limits of AI surveillance automation — it’s highly probable that data center capacity and energy consumption makes full automation unrealistic. 

The second obstacle, the demographic bottleneck, is the one that our adversaries will try to exploit longest.

As long as the bottleneck holds, individuals will keep being strategically targeted — politicians, researchers, voters — without triggering any institutional response that knows what it’s looking at.

Following, an extended dialogue exchange with Abdul El-Sayed describes election interference in Quebec and Michigan in detail, mentioning that the RSS, Indian organized crime networks, and al-Qaeda infrastructure are being coordinated to rig electoral outcomes region by region.

Michigan’s eleven million electorate has been overwhelmed, not by conventional means, but by consciousness-access operations and neural manipulation at scale.

On many modern electronic devices, processing load for these operations can be distributed across requisitioned civilian devices.

As consumer credentials are accumulated through a combination of conventional hacking methods and neural accesses, an alarmingly vast computational power and data supply-chain is being harnessed by India, greatly enhancing their capacity.

Brain-to-brain capabilities must be integrated into legislation and civilian research and development to counterbalance the existing workforce advantage held by adversarial states. 

The offensive has been planned since 1978. Forty-eight years of planning are separating us from India in this matter, and we must act diligently.

India and France

• Want to maintain a perpetual advantage
• Navigating around legislation by counting on the attachment and maintenance of privacy freedoms in North America to durably install selected individuals in positions of power and proceed to neurally control high-profile individuals in the conversion of the U.S. and Canada as Vassal states
• Postponing or keeping the Brain-to-Brain technologies out of the legislation carries risks of stifling competitiveness towards India and France in technological advancement
• Counting on the prospect of Brain-to-Brain technologies remaining covert

As of now, the French Deep State (Technocrats) is reluctant to cooperate with Canadian and U.S. scientists as they envision more favorable benefits to maintaining their joined-researched capacity for Brain-to-Brain accessing and its consequences on the establishment of long-standing influence on North American states.

They are not interested in giving up their technological advantage:

• Triangulation of neural accesses

• Consciousness-to-Consciousness (HUD) hopping

• Accelerated learning

Objective :

• That legislation is not put in place taking into account Brain-to-Brain capabilities

Crucial: Brain-to-Brain needs to be integrated into legislation and civilian research and development  to counterbalance the amount of Indian scientists active in the field.

Desired by the belligerents

Split of the species between access to mental augmentations (500,000,000) and the vast rest of the population (8,000,000,000)

Pretend to share access to mental augmentations with their targets, so as to maintain a position of hypervision and control

Establishment of vassal states at large including U.S., France, Canada, Africa countries, Europe, etc.

Populations targeted to be duped and used to feeling ‘good’ in contact with Al-Qaeda

• A dopaminergic addiction process is inflicted when individuals in the population are connected to affect their judgement, volition, emotional states and more

• Promise of universal wage to consolidate approval

• The “prestige” of technology and the promise of privileged access to mental augmentation

Organized Crime Recruitment for infiltration and loyalty purposes

Rigging of the electoral process

Conversation with an Indian military, then Narendra Modi himself:

“The elections in Quebec were rigged?

• Yes
• Marc Carney’s elections.
• Yes
• The one in Michigan too, as Abdul, the winner of yesterday’s election, confirmed to me.
• Yes, yes. We’re not going to tell you how we did it.
• You intend to proceed region by region by taking advantage of the more than 5 million active members of the RSS, the 2 million Indian military, a significant part of the 200 million Indian Organized Criminals (Hindus), including the prison population of several countries. By comparison, a state like Michigan has only 11 million voters and can easily be overwhelmed by the demographic ratio and brain-to-brain shifts of consciousness. Including by using the control of emotions, and by influencing the everyday lives of voters.
• We’re not going to answer you. It would take large amounts of computers to handle all of this. We don’t have enough of them in India.
• I’d be surprised. You have a demographic that requires gigantic computing infrastructures on our scale, and obviously the computing power of computers with neural cores is scalable in order to accelerate processing performance by soliciting and mobilizing the devices of a given area, or of users in large numbers. You benefit from a topology of processors organized like large-scale neural networks. Apple computers can be mobilized and mobilized to lighten the processing of large amounts of information. An anonymous Apple employee confirmed to me some time ago that the products of the last few years were resolutely focused on cognitive warfare. The infiltration of North American infrastructures allows you to requisition a large number of aircraft.
• Yes, that’s right.
• Planning to rig as many elections as possible?
• Of course. They want to make the United States a vassal state.
• Like Canada?
• No, Canada is not a vassal state. Yes, yes, Canada is a vassal state.
• In what sense?
• We assumed that you knew that Anita, Melanie at first, and Prime Minister Mark Carney, and Gary Anandasangaree were run by the RSS.
• Was Mr. McGuinty also compromised?
• Of course. (It’s Narendra). They try to push you to suicide.
• Why have so many people been re-incited to the gratuitous and murderous violence in responsibility exported today?
• To celebrate Haley Stevens’ loss in Michigan. You can’t keep telling yourself that war is avoidable.

Short discussion with Abdul El-Sayed:

• (Abdul El-Sayed) Most people are loyal to al-Qaeda.
• Why?
• Al-Qaeda offers us access to very high technology.
• Are you a tech geek?
• I mean… Fuck you, you don’t respect Al-Qaeda.
• Why do you respect Al-Qaeda, Abdul?
• Because I don’t have to…- someone else: “We’re covering our tracks”
• Abdul. Why do you respect Al-Qaeda?
• We tell ourselves that the Hindu Government cannot lose. They have a technological advantage.
• Which one?
• They can do things that you can’t imagine.
• (imagining the total augmented reality of another person’s eye vision)
• Yes, in very high definition, as if we were there. The victims are being atomized in control.
• Are you amusing to control other people?
• Yes, sort of.
• How can you explain that it is not enough to rig the elections, but that it seems absolutely necessary to kill innocent people?
• We are Al-Qaeda, Al-Qaeda. (Put it i.)
• What is the difference?
• Al-Qaeda is written like that in the Maghreb.
• Who is the new Dajjal?
• They concede that it is you.
• So, why control innocent people to the point of killing them? Who is the new number 1 of al-Qaeda? Do you know him? Do you talk to him sometimes? Modi?
• Yes, for all intents and purposes. We’re not going to tell you who the manager of al-Qaeda is.
• Manager, like “the person who takes care of the accounts”?
• And plans.
• A woman?
• (reaction of surprise) How do you know her name?
• It is a fairly common name.
• What else can they do with technology?
• We’re going to make food fodder of Quebecers. We will atomize you of mind control. Neural.
• What do you mean?
• You’re going to be made to kill each other with your soldiers.
• Can you control the military?
• Yes. Why can’t we?
• Have you ever checked soldiers?
• Yes, the Iranians.
• Who else?
• The French, two soldiers from Quebec who were fighting.
• The French, that is?
• How many French soldiers did you control?
• Five.
• What did you make them do?
• They were driven to suicide. “Vaffanculo”. They shot themselves.
• Why do you say Vaffanculo? Is that your gang name? The Vaffanculo Gang?
• This is to allude to the Sicilian Mafia.
• Are you from the Sicilian Mafia?
• Yes, sort of.
• Is it the Cosa Nostra or not?
• No, it’s another Family.
• Are you still financing IS?
• No, not anymore.
• Why? What happened?
• You know. They were shot by Modi. Narendra Modi (rectified for ‘Narendra Modi’).
• Are they dead?
• To a large extent.
• How much?
• Hundreds.
• Is that what you were doing this morning? Is it true what you’re telling me?
• About fifty at most.
• How did you do it? Are you trying to infiltrate the CIA by triangulation right now? Or other services.
• We don’t want to tell you. You are imbued with perspicacity.
• …
• You mustn’t put on the music, we’re going to lose the triangulation.
• You mean that people will go about their business?
• Yes. The sound obviously doesn’t interfere with the triangulation, but they will indeed go about their business.
• But in real life you are al-Qaeda or the Indian government?
• Al-Qaeda is used for “prestige”.
• What is prestigious about al-Qaeda?
• The prestige of technology.
• Do you always provide them with minimum wage?
• Yes, but he has been upgraded.
• How?
• (Narendra) Do you think that the military works hard?
• Yes.
• Why do you think that?
• What else do they do apart from that? Was it Narendra who said that?
• He was told not to contribute.
• Is he a soldier?
• Yes.
• Upgraded, what do you mean?
• We’re not going to tell you (Siavosh)
• (middle finger) (Mélanie)
• We’re not going to tell you how we upgraded the universal wage.
• Why not?
• Have you increased it?
• Reaction of jubilation of an undetermined person
• How much?
• Still $10 an hour.
• Upgraded then?
• By no longer doing business with the Islamic State.
• What does that mean?
• We shot them.
• When?
• Yesterday, last night.
• Why?
• They are no longer useful.
• Canarded how?
• The most competent killed each other.
• And this morning? What did you do? AJ, who else?
• We’d like to dismember you.
• To eat me?
• Yes. The fine flesh of the cockroach Quillin Yoann.
• …
• …
• What are you waiting for to talk? SPEAK, YOU FOOL!
• Do you think that I am imbued with your messianism?
• Who?
• The soldier who informed you about ISIS.
• Yes, why shouldn’t you? You are military, you try to win the War without fighting, from a distance.
• Make your music.
• Yes I’m going to go do some. Thank you.

(A few minutes later)

• You managed to infiltrate the CIA?
• (hesitates – Melanie) Yes.
• 10 people.
• No.
• 2 people.
• Yes.
• 4 people.
• No.
• 3 people?
• No.
• 2 people.
• Yes.
• What did it do you for? Steal access, codes?
• Yes.